Testing
Modern background job systems differ fundamentally in their execution model, and those differences shape how you test them. Inngest replays your entire function body on each step. Trigger.dev executes tasks as isolated units. BullMQ processes jobs as single-invocation functions with Redis-backed state. Getting your testing strategy wrong
Testing
Trigger.dev v3 brings a task-centric model for background jobs: each task is a durable, retriable unit that can spawn subtasks, wait on external events, and execute long-running logic without timeouts. Testing these tasks requires understanding their lifecycle and the tools Trigger.dev provides for isolation. Trigger.dev
Background Jobs
Background job systems fail in complex ways. A job can run twice due to a retry. A downstream service can be slow, causing queue buildup. A crash during execution can leave data in an inconsistent state. Testing these scenarios requires specific patterns that go beyond simple pass/fail test cases.
Python
Celery powers background task processing in Python applications. It's powerful but notoriously tricky to test because of its asynchronous, distributed nature. The good news: Celery ships with testing infrastructure that makes most scenarios straightforward. The tricky parts — retries, chains, countdown — require some extra care. Core Testing Modes CELERY_
Background Jobs
Faktory is a language-agnostic background job server created by Mike Perham (the creator of Sidekiq). Unlike Sidekiq, which is Redis-based and Ruby-only, Faktory is a standalone server with client libraries for Ruby, Go, Python, JavaScript, and other languages. Testing Faktory workers shares concepts with other queue systems
Ruby on Rails
Background jobs are a core part of most Rails applications — email delivery, image processing, webhook dispatch, data export. But they're also one of the most commonly undertested parts of a codebase. Jobs execute asynchronously in production, making failures easy to miss and hard to debug. Sidekiq is the
Background Jobs
Scheduled jobs and cron tasks are notoriously difficult to test. They run at specific times, interact with the real world (databases, APIs, files), and often involve time-sensitive logic. A monthly billing job that ran at 2:01 instead of 2:00 for a daylight saving transition can cause real
Node.js
BullMQ is the modern successor to Bull for Node.js background job processing. It uses Redis for persistence and supports advanced patterns: priorities, rate limiting, flows (parent/child jobs), and job groups. Testing BullMQ requires understanding when to use real Redis versus mocks, and how to make workers testable. Testing